Legal Opinion
In Re Advisory Opinion on Professional Ethics No. 361
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided July 19, 1978PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Per curiam
Petitioners are a number of assistant county prosecutors who moved pursuant to R. 1:19-8 for review of Opinion Wo. 361 of the Supreme Court’s Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics. We granted the petition and heard oral argument. The Attorney General and the County Prosecutors Association were permitted to intervene.
Opinion Wo. 361 reads as follows:
We have two inquiries as to whether a firm may represent defendants who were investigated or under indictment during the time an associate of the firm was on the staff of the county prosecutor concerned with the matters.
In our opinion it may…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Standard Oil CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Allied Realty of St. Paul v. Exchange Nat. Bank of ChicagoDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1968
- Hilo Metals Company, Ltd. v. Learner CompanyDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1966
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. Miller, William G.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Ralph H. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Reardon v. Marlayne, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Cardona v. General Motors Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- State v. BellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.