Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 28, 1951PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevikt, J.

Tbe application of the defendant Railroad Company filed with the Utilities Commission was not for the .purpose of obtaining authority to close its railroad station at Stokes, but to close the agency, that is, to dispense with the services of a local agent at that station, for the reasons set out in the application.

The facts were not controverted. The question presented to us for decision is whether these facts afford substantial evidence, in view of the entire record, which would support the conclusion reached by the court below that public convenience and necessity warranted the continued…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Washington Ex Rel. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co. v. FairchildSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Utilities Commission v. . Trucking Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Seward v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Kurn v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Southern Ry. Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. State Ex Rel. North Carolina Utilities Commission v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Arizona Corporation Com'n v. Southern Pacific Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1960
  4. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API