State Ex Rel. North Carolina Utilities Commission v. Casey
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDenNY, J.
The City of Kinston is not a formal party to this proceeding. However, in addition to the facts found by the Commission, it appears from the evidence introduced in the hearing below that the City of Kinston serves through its electric distribution system approximately 8,700 customers within its corporate limits, and about 2,400 customers outside its corporate limits. It further appears, if the agreement entered into by and between the City of Kinston and the Power Company on 20 January 1955 is consummated it will mean the transfer of 238 customers of the Power Company who reside in the Spence…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Utilities Commission v. . Trucking Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Crum v. Mt. Shasta Power Corp.California Supreme Court · 1934
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- I.C.R.R. Co. v. Ill. Commerce Com.Illinois Supreme Court · 1947
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Duke Power Co. v. Blue Ridge Electric Membership Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State Ex Rel. North Carolina Utilities Commission v. Westco Telephone Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.