Seward v. Denver & Rio Grande Railroad
New Mexico Supreme Court
From Corporation Commission. Constitutional and statutory provisions governing this ■case. Sec. 1, art. 11, Constitution of New Mexico; sec. 7, art. 11; chap. 78, laws of 1912; id., secs. 2, 3, 13; sec. '8, art. 11, Constitution; sec. 18, art. 2, Constitution; sec. 1, 14th amendment Constitution of IJ. S.; sec. 20, art. 2, State Constitution; sec. 12, art. 2, state constitution. ■ The order of the Commission is not self-executing. Peo. y. Ry., 103 N. Y. 95: Peo. y.
Read the full summary
From Corporation Commission. Constitutional and statutory provisions governing this ■case. Sec. 1, art. 11, Constitution of New Mexico; sec. 7, art. 11; chap. 78, laws of 1912; id., secs. 2, 3, 13; sec. '8, art. 11, Constitution; sec. 18, art. 2, Constitution; sec. 1, 14th amendment Constitution of IJ. S.; sec. 20, art. 2, State Constitution; sec. 12, art. 2, state constitution. ■ The order of the Commission is not self-executing. Peo. y. Ry., 103 N. Y. 95: Peo. y. Ry., 104 N. Y. 58; Ry. y. Refining Co., 137 Ped. 353; Pate v. Ry., 120 N. C. 877. This court is not restricted to the ministerial…
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OP THE COURT.
ROBERTS, C. J.
Before reviewing the order or the State Corporation Commission, for the purpose of determining-the reasonableness and lawfulness of the same, it will be necessary for us to consider and dispose of numerous constitutional questions, raised by defendant, and questions of practice and procedure interposed by both parties. We believe that many of these questions will best be solved by a general resume of the provisions of the constitution under which they arise and a statement of our views in regard thereto, supported by such authorities as we have been able to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. North Carolina Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Kentucky Railroad Tax CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Washington Ex Rel. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co. v. FairchildSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Wadley Southern Railway Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. New Mexico State Corp. CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- State Corporation Com'n v. Mountain States Tel. & Tel. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
- Ferguson-Steere Motor Co. v. State Corp. CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
- State Ex Rel. Transcontinental Bus Service, Inc. v. CarmodyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.