Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 12, 1966PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.

A railroad or other public utility corporation is engaged in the operation of a privately owned business. By virtue of the nature of the services it undertakes to render, certain exceptional duties are imposed upon it by the common law and by statute, and the Utilities Commission is authorized by statute to regulate its activities. In other respects, the company has the same freedom as does any other corporation in the management of its properties and in the employment and assignment of the duties of its employees.

The Utilities Commission has no authority to regulate, or impose duties upon, a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Corporation Commission v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. National Merchandising Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. STATE EX REL. UTILITIES COM'N v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  5. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API