Legal Opinion
United Construction Workers and United Mine Workers of America v. Haislip Baking Company, a Virginia Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided June 13, 1955No. 6951PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal in an action under section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 185(a), to recover damages for alleged breach of a collective bargaining contract. The plaintiff is the Haislip Baking Company, a corporation of Norton, Virginia, and the defendants are the United Construction Workers and the United Mine Workers of America. The case was heard before a jury which returned a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $462,611.53. On motion of defendants for judgment n.o.v. or for a new trial, the judgment n.o.v. was denied but a partial new trial…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Virginian Ry. Co. v. ArmentroutCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- National Labor Relations Board v. Highland Park Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
- National Labor Relations Board v. Draper CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Carbon Fuel Co. v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Michael Lee Thomas v. Ltv CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Local Union No. 25, A.F.L. v. W. L. Mead, Inc., (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1956
- Eazor Express, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.