Legal Opinion
U-Tex Oil Co. v. Pauley
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 29, 1962No. Civ. 6657PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShepard, J.
This is an appeal by defendants from a judgment in favor of plaintiff in a quiet title action involving lease forfeiture and damages.
Pleading
Because of some questions relating to what issues were before the trial court, it is necessary briefly to outline the pleading. Prior to judgment, all defendants except the Pauleys were dismissed from the action. For brevity, plaintiff will hereinafter be called U-Tex and defendants will be called Pauley.
Two causes of action are set forth in the complaint. The first cause is in the form of a quiet title action with the usual allegation of title in U-Tex…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Waterman v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Bank of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Mitau v. RoddanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Sime v. MaloufCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bullis v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Hebbard v. ColgroveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- King v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Bank of Orient v. Superior Court of S.F.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Southern California Title Clearing Co. v. LawsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.