Maloney v. Ketter
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from a trial court order denying appellant’s motion for amended findings and, in the alternative, a new trial. Appellant claims the trial court abused its discretion under Minn.R.Civ.P. 59.01 because (1) the verdict regarding valuation of the partnership is not justified by the evidence, (2) the verdict was contrary to law regarding misrepresentation and failure to credit appellant interest on his contribution of inventory and cash, (3) errors of law occurred regarding admission of evidence, (4) damages awarded respondent were excessive, and (5)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Davis v. Re-Trac Manufacturing CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Jenson v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Advanced Training Systems Inc. v. Caswell Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Poppenhagen v. SORNSIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Estate of Serbus v. SerbusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Vangsness v. VangsnessCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Homer v. GuzulaitisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991