Legal Opinion
In Re Acterna Corp. Securities Litigation
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided July 26, 2005No. CIV.A. DKC 2003-1131PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHASANOW, District Judge.
Presently pending and ready for resolution in this class action alleging violations of federal securities laws are Defendants’ separate motions to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Also pending is Plaintiffs’ motion to strike certain exhibits filed by Defendant Prieewat-erhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”). The issues have been fully briefed and the court now rules, no hearing being deemed necessary. Local Rule 105.6. For the following reasons, Plaintiffs’ motion to strike will be granted in part and…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re Remec Incorporated Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2010
- In re Municipal Mortgage & Equity, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. GoldstoneDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
- In Re Williams Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2007
- Payne v. DeLucaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.