Legal Opinion

Kinney v. Heatherington

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 21, 1913No. 1751PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from District Court, Pawnee Cotmty; L. M. Poe, Judge. Action by Michael J. McNeal, by his guardian, David Kinney, against J. F. Heatherington, as administrator of the estate of Henry A. Gifford, deceased, and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

This case presents error from the district court of Pawnee county. February 29, 1908, Michael J. McNeal, by and through his duly appointed guardian, David Kinney, brought his action against J. F. Heatherington, as the administrator of Henry A. Gifford, deceased, and against the surviving heirs of the said decedent. The object of the suit and the preliminary facts upon which reliance is based for recovery are best set forth in the petition of plaintiff, which in part reads as follows:

“That on December 16, 1907, by the consideration of the county court of said county, Michael J. McNeal was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Peugh v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Bork v. . MartinNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Cowan v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1906

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. LongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. City of Healdton v. BlackburnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Hamilton, Co. v. International Bank of HaskellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Home Petroleum Co. v. ChipmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API