Legal Opinion

Spicers, Inc. v. Rudd

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 16, 1947No. 32801PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBayless, J.

This is an action for damages prosecuted by plaintiff, Thomas Wayne Rudd, a minor, by his father and next friend, against defendants, Spicers, Incorporated, the American Fidelity & Casualty Company, and Vernon Eugene Miller. The jury returned a verdict in plaintiff’s favor for $20,000 and judgment was rendered on the verdict against Spicers, Incorporated, and Miller for $20,000 and against the American Fidelity & Casualty Company for $5,000. Defendants have appealed from this judgment. Parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court, except the American Fidelity & Casualty…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stephens v. Oklahoma City Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Kelly v. CannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. Shefts Supply Co. v. PurkapileSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Ross v. GearinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Magnolia Pipe Line Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lingerfelt v. Winn-Dixie Texas, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Shebester, Inc. v. FordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  3. R & S AUTO SERVICE v. McGillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  4. Hubbard v. CoatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  5. Bray v. Yellow Freight System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API