Legal Opinion

Ross v. Gearin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 16, 1930No. 19659PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, O.

This action was originally brought in the justice of the peace court by the defendant in error, Omer Gearin, against Sam Ross, the plaintiff in error, to recover the sum of $200- damages which the plaintiff alleged he sustained by reason of a collision between his automobile and an unlighted truck which defendant stopped or parked at nighttime on the public highway.

The essential facts in the case are as follows : The defendant, Sam Ross, was a trucking contractor living in the town of Kelleyville, Creek county, in this state. The defendant, through h'is employees, was hauling, by…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Berkovitz v. American River Gravel Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Murphy v. HawthorneOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Commonwealth v. HenryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  4. Stroud v. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  5. Jaquith v. WordenWashington Supreme Court · 1913

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dalley v. Mid-Western Dairy Products Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Long v. Ponca City Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  3. Sprague v. HerbelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
  4. Shefts Supply Co. v. PurkapileSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Spicers, Inc. v. RuddSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API