Legal Opinion

Lingerfelt v. Winn-Dixie Texas, Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 23, 1982No. 53233PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLIN, Justice:

This is a “slip-and-fall” case with a different twist. Shall the traditional “notice” requirement to storekeeper be waived in situations of negligence in the display and packaging of goods? We answer in the affirmative.

Margaret Lingerfelt (Shopper) stopped at defendant’s Guthrie store (Store) one Sunday afternoon to pick up a few items. Just inside the front door she noticed a display of strawberries, heaped high in uncovered containers. The strawberries were not covered with cellophane because Store’s wrapping machine was broken. While in a different part of the store,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bozza v. Vornado, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  2. Ciminski v. Finn Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  3. Rogers v. HennesseeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  4. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of Tulsa, Okl. v. Von BradySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  5. Pratt v. WomackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Sheil v. T.G. & Y. Stores Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. Sheehan v. Roche Bros. Supermarkets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  3. Kelly v. Stop & Shop, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  4. Wintersteen v. Food Lion, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  5. Maans v. Giant of Maryland, L.L.C.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API