Legal Opinion

Osborne v. Kimball

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1889PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error from Butler Bistriet Court. Replevin, by Osborne against Kimball. Judgment for defendant, at the May term, 1887. The plaintiff brings the case to this court. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J.:

Ransom Osborne and Ira Kimball are, and for several years last past have been, owners of adjoining farms *188in Butler county, where the herd law of 1872 is in force. On April 19, 1886, Osborne’s cattle to the number of about 56, which were being fed on his farm, strayed upon the adjoining premises of Kimball, and there ate and destroyed quite a number of shocks of corn belonging to Kimball. Kimball at once took possession of the cattle, and claimed the right under the herd law to hold them until the damages which they had done were paid. On…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. Frankenthal & Bro.Illinois Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Wolf v. DozerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  3. Nay v. MograinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  4. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. MossmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Trout v. OgilvieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  2. Tyler v. WindelsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  3. Radio Corporation v. Cable Radio Tube CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  4. Union Savings & Trust Co. v. KrummWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Heine v. First Trust Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1935

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API