Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Barbour
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 19, 2008No. Civil Action 07-1665 (CKK)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
This cases involves adverse claims on the life insurance policy proceeds of Julia W. Barbour (“Decedent”), a retiree of the United States Department of Labor. As a federal employee, the Decedent received life insurance coverage pursuant to the Federal Employees’ Group Life Insurance Act (“FEGLIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 8701 et seq., under which the Government obtained a group life insurance policy from the Plaintiff, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”). MetLife filed this interplead er action seeking to deposit the policy proceeds…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Smith v. Washington Post CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Saha v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. BarbourDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Shaw v. ShawDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2023