Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Barbour
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 14, 2009No. Civil Action 07-1665 (CKK)Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
So we beat on,
boats against the current,
borne back ceaselessly into the past. 1
This interpleader action involves adverse claims on the proceeds of Julia W. Barbour’s (the “Decedent’s”) life insurance policy. On May 19, 2008, the Court granted a Motion for Interpleader relief filed by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”) to deposit the proceeds of the policy (approximately $134,000 plus interest) into the Registry of the Court. 2 What remains in this case is the determination of who among the Defendant-Claimants is the proper…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Margaret Christ, Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for Kelly Christ, Jeffrey Christ, and Anthony Christ, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Melba Christ, and Margaret Christ, Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for Kelly Christ, Jeffrey Christ, and Anthony ChristCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Cora Jean Terry, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Third Party v. David M. Lagrois, Christopher J. Gamble, and Daniel R. Gamble, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Evans v. AbneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. BarbourDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. HurfordDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1997