Legal Opinion
Infeld v. Sullivan
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 7, 1964PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtComley, J.
The defendant admitted liability in this case. The jury returned a verdict for the plain*508tiff for compensatory damages on the first count of the complaint which alleged negligent operation of an automobile and for exemplary damages on the second count, which alleged wanton misconduct.
The defendant admitted in his answer that he ran into the motor vehicle driven by the plaintiff and that, when he did so, he was driving at an unreasonable speed and while under the influence of intoxicating liquor and was “completely to the left of the center” of the highway. The defendant further admitted that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gombos v. AsheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- State v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Sebastian v. WoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
- Brock v. WaldronSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Miller v. BlantonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Alaimo v. RoyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Smith v. Gray Concrete Pipe Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Commonwealth v. ConnollyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Johnson v. RogersUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. HancichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.