Legal Opinion

Fleming v. Arsenal Bldg. Corporation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 9, 1940PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLANCY, District Judge.

We have used as headings for this decision the titles given to their motions by each of the moving parties. Each of the orders to show cause on which the motions were instituted also bears the legend “Civil Action No. 8-68.” The defendants named in the first title and the petitioner, Wiesen, all move to vacate and quash a subpoena served on Wiesen. We think the heading “Philip B. Fleming, Administrator, Wage and Flour Division, United States Department of Labor v. Arsenal Building Corporation and Spear & Co. Inc.” is an arrogation by the attorney for those defendants of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Claire Furnace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Janssen v. Belding-Corticelli, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1936
  3. In re HallDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1924
  4. In re ShawU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1909
  5. United States v. National Biscuit Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cudahy Packing Co. v. FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
  2. Andrews v. Nevada State Board of CosmetologyNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Fleming v. Easton Pub. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. IsbrandtsenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
  5. Andrews v. Nevada State Board of CosmetologyNevada Supreme Court · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API