Legal Opinion
Janssen v. Belding-Corticelli, Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 9, 1936No. 5842-5845PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Circuit Judge.
This case is here on appeal from orders of the District Court directing the appellants to appear, testify, and produce certain documents and exhibits before Everett G., Rodebaugh Esquire, appointed commissioner by the Exchequer Court of Canada in its commission obtained in a suit by appellees, Belding-Corticelli, Ltd., et al. v. Charles A. Kaufman, 10 F.Supp. 991, to annul or impeach a Canadian patent issued to Kaufman. The appellants are not parties to this suit and have no interest whatever in it.
The commission did not give Mr. Rodebaugh, as commissioner, authority to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Go-Bart Importing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Cogen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Gumbel v. PitkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Savannah v. JesupSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Force's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- In Re Premises Located at 840 140th Ave. NeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- In Re Letter Rogatory From the Justice Court, District of Montreal, Canada. Appeal of John FecarottaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- In the Matter of Letters Rogatory Issued by the Director of Inspection of the Government of India to Take the Testimony of the President or Other Designated Representative of Messrs. Brown Brothers, Harriman & Company and the President or Other Designated Representative of Chase Manhattan BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- In Re Letters Rogatory From the City of Haugesund, Norway, Harvey D. EmettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.