Legal Opinion
United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Isbrandtsen
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 21, 1965PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
HERLANDS, District Judge.
Jakob Isbrandtsen (hereinafter “the witness”) has moved, pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 30 and 45, for an order “to quash a subpoena served” on him and issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (hereinafter “SEC”) or, “in the alternative, to terminate” his examination by the SEC.
The subpoena in question, dated August 26, 1965, was returnable on September 1, 1965 before the SEC’s New York office. (Exh. 1, attached to the Leaman moving affidavit.)
The inquiry in connection with which the subpoena was issued is a non-public investigation by the SEC “in the Matter of The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Reisman v. CaplinSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Manuel E. Kulukundis and M. Michael KulukundisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Application of John A. Howard to Quash Summons Issued to Him by the Internal Revenue Service in Connection With His Tax Liability and to Vacate the Service in Connection With His Tax Liability and for a Temporary Stay of the Special Agents Hearing Pending Decision of the Application to Quash and Vacate. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
- Guaranty Underwriters, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
- Fleming v. Arsenal Bldg. CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fleet/Norstar Financial Group, Inc. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1991