Legal Opinion
Cudahy Packing Co. v. Fleming
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided October 11, 1941No. 11956PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSEN, Circuit Judge.
The Cudahy Packing Company operates two meat-packing plants in the State of Minnesota, one at St. Paul and the other at Newport. It admits that it is engaged in interstate commerce at its Newport plant, but contends that the business of the St. Paul plant is intrastate only.
The Acting Regional Director of the Wage and Flour Division for the Minnesota area, claiming to have reasonable grounds to believe that the Company was violating the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., directed an investigation to he made at both its plants, under § 11 of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Federal Trade Commission v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Fleming v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Perkins v. Endicott Johnson CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- General Tobacco & Grocery Co. v. FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- Federal Trade Commission v. Scientific Living, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
- United States v. WoerthDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1955
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.