Legal Opinion
Armstrong Cork Co. v. Patterson-Sargent Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided April 5, 1950No. Civil No. 25450PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Chief Judge.
This is an action involving violations of plaintiff’s trademark rights by the defendant.
Issue was joined August 30, 1948. Since that time plaintiff has taken several expensive depositions but it has at no time filed a request for trial and at one time this action faced dismissal for want of prosecution. On January 27, 1950, defendant moved for leave to file an amended answer.
The amendments in effect do two things : One withdraws what plaintiff alleges is a judicial admission and the other 'amendment asserts that plaintiff’s trademark, Lino-Gloss, is merely descriptive and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. Donnelly Garment Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. RickenbakerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
- Hancock Oil Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
- Moore v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1938
- Geopulos v. MandesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- George J. Gallon v. The Lloyd-Thomas Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
- Arista Records, Inc. v. Flea World, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
- Lester R. Cooper and Allstate Insurance Company v. American Employers' Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
- Fli-Fab, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1954
- Aida Engineering, Inc. v. Red Stag, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.