International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. Donnelly Garment Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
The appellees, in their petitions for rehearing, argue that we have misconstrued and misapplied the recent rulings of the Supreme Court referred to in our opinion. They assert that the record sufficiently discloses that the necessary effect of the threatened activities of appellants would be to create or to tend to create a monopoly and to affect prices to the prejudice of consumers, to bring the case within the Sherman Act. Appellees in effect reargue what we have decided. If we have misconstrued the rulings of the Supreme Court referred to in our opinion or have misap…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. Memphis Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WulfSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. KinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Robertson v. CeaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. WylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Donald v. Amoco Production Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1999
- National Labor Relations Board v. Donnelly Garment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Kevin Naylor v. Case and McGrath Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- McLellan v. Mississippi Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.