Legal Opinion

Moore v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 12, 1934PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBbogdeN, J.

Tbe controlling questions of law are these:

1. When was the action for the reformation and correction of the indemnity contracts begun?

2. Is such cause of action barred by the statute of limitations ?

The depository bonds involved in this litigation contain a clause worded as follows: “The company shall not be liable hereunder for the payment of any sum due upon any certificate of deposit issued by the bank.” It was admitted, and found as a fact by the trial judge, that $15,833.33, in the bank at the time of closing to the credit of plaintiff treasurer, was evidenced by certificate or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Floars v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. Clements v. Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Burton v. Life & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. Jones v. . VanstorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Latham v. LathamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Huss v. HussCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Williams v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Shepard v. Ocwen Federal Bank, FSBCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. Faircloth v. Financial Asset Securities Corp. Mego Mortgage Homeowner Loan TrustCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
  5. McCabe v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API