Legal Opinion
Tyler v. Schnabel
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 3, 1994No. 12298PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.
The plaintiff, Clyde R. Tyler, appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion for a prejudgment remedy pursuant to General Statutes § 52-278d.1 On appeal, the plaintiff asserts that the trial court improperly denied his motion in light of its factual findings.2 We agree.
This appeal arises from the lengthy litigation between the plaintiff and the defendants, Ruth K. Schnabel and *218Philip Schnabel. On February 20, 1990, the plaintiff sued Philip for false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, abuse of process and violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983.3 On December 19,1991, the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Catz v. RubensteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Champagne v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Augeri v. C. F. Wooding Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- E. J. Hansen Elevator, Inc. v. StollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Bizzoco v. ChinitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Farrell v. FarrellConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Carpenter v. Granderson (In Re Granderson)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
- Dietter v. DietterConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Bosco v. Arrowhead by Lake, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Connecticut National Bank v. D'OnofrioConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.