Legal Opinion

Hamman v. Ritchie

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 11, 1977No. 17796PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MASSEY, Chief Justice.

On the appeal the Court is presented with an example of how not to provide a deferred bequest by will, how not to provide by will for property devise in trust, and how not to administer a trust estate.

Involved is tragic litigation between family members in which probability is that all will lose, coupled with possibility of resultant participation in the loss by the chil dren/grandchildren. Certainly these could not profit. Nevertheless, the decision of this Court upon the rights of parties litigant may not thereby be influenced. The parties must be treated as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Slay v. Burnett TrustTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Burnham v. Hardy Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Cox v. DavisonTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Eaton v. HustedTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Wagnon v. WagnonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Glover v. Union Pacific Railroad, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
  2. Crenshaw v. SwensonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Meyer v. HansenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Ladd Petroleum Corp. v. Eagle Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. Jewell Robbins v. Amoco Production CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API