Cox v. Davison
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NORVELL, Justice.
The Texas rule is that a cotenant who produces minerals from common property without having secured the consent of his cotenants is accountable to them on the basis of the value of the minerals taken less the necessary and reasonable cost of producing and marketing the same. Burnham v. Hardy Oil Co., 147 S.W. 330 (Tex.Civ.App., 1912), affirmed, 108 Tex. 555, 195 S.W. 1139 (1917); Stroud v. Guffey, 3 S.W.2d 592 (Tex.Civ.App., 1927), affirmed, 16 S.W.2d 527, 64 A.L.R. 730 (Tex.Sup., 1929); White v. Smyth, 214 S.W.2d 953 (Tex.Civ.App., 1947), affirmed, 147 Tex. 272, 214 S.W.2d…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Burnham v. Hardy Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1917
- Earp v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Burnham v. Hardy Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Guffey v. StroudTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- White v. SmythTexas Supreme Court · 1948
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Stahl Petroleum Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
- Wagner & Brown, Ltd. v. SheppardTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- Prize Energy Resources, L.P. v. Cliff Hoskins, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Byrom v. PendleyTexas Supreme Court · 1986
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.