Legal Opinion

Schauder v. Brager

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 28, 1985No. 125, September Term, 1984PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

We shall here hold that under Maryland Code (1957, 1979 Repl.Vol.) Art. 101, § 57 the Workmen’s Compensation Commission is empowered to approve fees of physicians and others who evaluate a claimant in preparation for trial and who appear for a claimant at trial. This section provides in pertinent part:

“No person shall charge or collect any compensation for legal services in connection with any claims arising under this article, or for services or treatment rendered or supplies furnished pursuant to § 37 of this article, unless the same be approved by the Commission. When so…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Comptroller of Treasury v. John C. Louis Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  2. Holy Cross Hospital of Silver Spring, Inc. v. Health Services Cost Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  3. Queen v. AggerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  4. Congoleum Nairn, Inc. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
  5. Lukas v. Bar Ass'n of Montgomery County, Maryland, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Morris v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. Breitenbach v. N.B. Handy Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. R & T Construction Co. v. JudgeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  4. Howes v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Prince George's County v. FitzhughCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API