Legal Opinion
Queen v. Agger
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided March 26, 1980No. [No. 58, September Term, 1979.]PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavidson, J.
Maryland’s Workmen’s Compensation Act, Md. Code (1957, 1979 Repl. Vol.), Art. 101, §§ 1 — 101, effective 16 April 1.914, is designed to protect workers and their families from hardships inflicted by work-related injuries. Edgewood Nursing Home v. Maxwell, 282 Md. 422, 426, 384 A.2d 748, 751 (1978); Solvuca v. Ryan & Reilly Co., 131 Md. 265, 268, 284, 101 A. 710, 711, 716 (1917). More particularly, it is designed to provide workers with compensation for loss of earning capacity resulting from accidental injury, disease or death arising out of and in the course of employment, to provide…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dempsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Walston v. Sun Cab Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Solvuca v. Ryan & Reilly Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
- Bethlehem-Sparrows Point Shipyard, Inc. v. DamasiewiczCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
- Liggett & Meyers Tobacco Co. v. GoslinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Newell v. RichardsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- DeBusk v. Johns Hopkins HospitalCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Montgomery County v. DeiblerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Beard v. American Agency Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Howard County Ass'n for Retarded Citizens, Inc. v. WallsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.