Legal Opinion

In Re Myrtle

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 9, 1905No. Civ. No. 143PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPLICATION for writ of habeas corpus to the warden of the state prison under commitment from the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBuckles, J.

The defendant was arrested upon a warrant charging him with the crime of robbery committed January 18, 1902, upon a complaint, the charging part of which is in the following language: “Did willfully, unlawfully and feloniously take, steal and carry away from the person and immediate presence of one E. F. 0. Kloklce one twenty-dollar gold coin of the United States, certain silver coins lawful and current money of the United States, of the value of two dollars, one hunting case stem winding gold watch and one gold and platinum link chain with gold locket attached, all of which said property was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. AmmermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Ex parte WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. People v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Ex parte McCulloughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Smith v. AbramNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Sullivan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. McGinnis v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1907
  5. In Re Cook Ex Rel. MurrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API