Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Kirschner v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1998No. 1995-1649PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 82 Ohio St.3d 90.] THE STATE EX REL. KIRSCHNER, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO; DAYTON CPC GROUP, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Kirschner v. Indus. Comm.,

1998-Ohio-368.] Workers’ compensation—Industrial Commission’s denial of claimant-retiree’s application for impaired earning capacity benefits returned for further consideration and amended order, when. (No. 95-1649—Submitted March 24, 1998—Decided June 10, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 94APD05-762. __________________ {¶ 1}…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Johnson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State ex rel. CPC Group v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State ex rel. Pauley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State ex rel. Kirschner v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. David's Cemetery v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State ex rel. Garon v. Univ. Hosp. of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API