Legal Opinion

Seeley v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1998No. 96-337PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Chief Justice.

Appellant, convicted for felony possession of cocaine, alleges several errors by the district court. First, appellant claims the State presented insufficient evidence to support his conviction. Appellant also contends he was unfairly prejudiced by the admission of testimony describing a “white residue” on a plastic tray and a mirror found in his backpack. Finally, appellant alleges the district court denied him his constitutional right to be present and represented by counsel when it sent an “Allen-type” instruction to the jury room during deliberations. We find…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Kentucky v. StincerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Gleason v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Dysthe v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Skinner v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Campbell v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Belden v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API