Legal Opinion

Underhill v. Knox

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 25, 1984No. C4-84-639PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

Respondent Underhill commenced an action against appellant Knox, a chiropractor, alleging malpractice for failing to make an accurate diagnosis of a fractured femur. Knox defended by asserting the two year statute of limitations applicable to “physicians” under Minn.Stat. § 541.07(1) (1980) and moved for summary judgment dismissing Underhill’s complaint. On January 20, 1983, a special term judge denied the motion. On March 27, 1984, the trial court, being of the view that the question presented was important and doubtful, certified the issue to this court pursuant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Winthrop Laboratories Division of Sterling Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  2. Goss v. GossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  3. Campbell v. Glenwood Hills Hospitals, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  4. In RE CONDEMNATION BY OAK CENTER CREAMERY CO. v. GrobeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  5. Ingebritson v. TJERNLUND MANUFACTURING COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tackleson v. Abbott-Northwestern Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Kensinger v. KippenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API