Legal Opinion

Weyerhaeuser Timber Co. v. Pierce County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1917No. 13344PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Cross-appeals from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Clifford, J., entered November 6, 1915, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, in consolidated actions to cancel taxes and to recover taxes paid under protest, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, C. J.

The Weyerhaeuser Timber Company and the Northwestern Improvement Company began separate actions against Pierce county for the cancellation of a portion of the taxes assessed against certain timber lands for the year 1914 on the ground of overvaluation, and for recovery of excess payments made under protest. By stipulation the two actions were consolidated for trial, with an agreement that separate judgments be entered. Supplemental complaints were filed presenting the same issue as to the assessed valuations for the year 1915, upon which taxes were not then due. The Weyerhaeuser Timber…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Greene v. Louisville & Interurban RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Templeton v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Harbican v. ChamberlinWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Spokane & Eastern Trust Co. v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. First Thought Gold Mines, Ltd. v. Stevens CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. Gilbert Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Hershey v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Bennett v. Grays Harbor CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Ozette Railway Co. v. Grays Harbor CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Adams County v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API