Legal Opinion
United States v. Jose Luis Rivera-Sillas
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 29, 2005No. 03-50244PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Our opinion filed on July 15, 2004, and published at 376 F.3d 887, is AMENDED as follows:
We withdraw the content of the paragraph on page 893 beginning with “Rivera-Sillas contends that if the Government need not prove that a defendant has knowledge of his presence in the United States, ...” and substitute the following paragraph in its place:
Rivera-Sillas contends that if the Government need not prove that a defendant has knowledge of his presence in the United States, a person may be criminally convicted for inadvertently wandering into this country. We addressed this potential problem…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. Calvin Wayne BucklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Alabama v. SheltonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. Javier Rivera-Sanchez, A/K/A Jose SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Alfredo Gracidas-UlibarryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Francisco Pena-Cabanillas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. Jose Covian-SandovalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Gumercindo Salazar-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Marguet-PilladoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Hernandez-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.