Legal Opinion
United States v. Taylor
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 5, 2006No. 05-3417PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY
HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
Charles Taylor pleaded guilty in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas to bank robbery. See 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). After his direct appeal was denied, United States v. Taylor, 353 F.3d 868 (10th Cir.2003), he filed a motion for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, alleging a Speedy Trial Act violation and several instances of ineffective assistance of counsel. The district court denied the motion, and Mr. Taylor now seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) from us. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). We hold that Mr.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Carter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. Angel Cepero A/K/A Angel Villar-Cepero A/K/A Mosquito Angel CeperoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Paul v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Howell v. TrammellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Gonzales v. HartleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. TrinkleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.