United States v. Jose Covian-Sandoval
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
D.W. NELSON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Jose Covian-Sandoval (“Covian”) appeals his conviction and sentence for attempted illegal entry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Covian contends that the district court’s plea colloquy was inadequate under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 (“Rule 11”), and that the district court’s enhancement of Covian’s sentence violated Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Because we conclude that any such errors do not warrant relief under the plain error standard of review, we affirm.
I
On February 3, 2005, Covian was indicted for…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by144 opinions
- Butler v. CurryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Salazar-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Becerril-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Luis Narvaez-Gomez, AKA Manuel Gomez-FelizCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Felipe Zepeda-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.