Legal Opinion

Davis v. Montgomery

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1890No. 14,082PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From the Jackson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, C. J.

This suit was instituted by Montgomery against Davis and wife, to foreclose a mortgage executed *588by the latter, and to recover the amount of two promissory notes for $2,000 each, with interest, the notes being secured by the mortgage, a copy of which is exhibited with the complaint. The facts set up by way of defence were, in effect, that the consideration of the notes sued on was the unpaid balance of the purchase-price of the real estate described in the mortgage, which the defendant, Thomas S. Davis, purchased from the plaintiff.

It is averred, that for the purpose of inducing Davis to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. AcresIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Hyatt v. MattinglyIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Ringle v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Kelso v. WolfIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MacyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Southwestern Cotton Seed Oil v. the Bank of StroudSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
  3. City of Ft. Wayne v. Capehart-Farnsworth Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. State Exchange Bank v. PaulIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Graham v. YatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API