Ringle v. First National Bank

By the assignment of errors upon the record of this cause, the sufficiency of appellees’ complaint to withstand a demurrer, for the alleged want of facts, is the first question we are required to consider and decide herein.

This suit was commenced by the appellees, First National Bank of Kendallville and John Mitchell, against the appellants, Peter Ringle and Nancy Ringle, on the 10th day of January, 1885. In their complaint the appellees showed at great length, that long before the 13th day of May, 1871, divers named parties had recovered divers judgments for divers sums of money and costs,…