Legal Opinion

Kelso v. Wolf

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1879PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Floyd Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, J.

— Suit on a promissory note made by the appellants to Epaminondas Williams, and assigned by Williams to the appellee. Answers and replies. Trial by the court, finding and judgment for appellee. Appeal.

The only point made in the ease is “that the finding is not sustained by the evidence.”

The complaint avers that “ Said defendants, by their promissory note,” etc., “promised to pay,” etc., setting out the note as an exhibit, and' then avers the death of one of the makers of the note, and makes his executor a party defendant, by proper averments. The a'ppellants think that there is a “missing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dix v. AkersIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Rosenbaum v. McThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Frank v. KesslerIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  4. City of Indianapolis v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Walpole's Administrator v. CarlisleIndiana Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Davis v. MontgomeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Millikan v. PattersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Central Business Men's Assn. v. MatthewsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. Mackison v. CleggIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Driscoll v. Batchelor's Bottling Works, Inc.Superior Court of Rhode Island · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API