Legal Opinion

Hyatt v. Mattingly

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1879PublishedCited by 19 opinions

From the Daviess Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

This was a suit by the appellee against the *272appellant, in a complaint of two paragraphs. The first paragraph of the complaint counted upon a warranty deed, executed by the appellant and his wife to the appellee, on the 9th day of September, 1857, wherein and whereby it was alleged that the appellant and his wife had, on the day, month and year last named, conveyed and warranted to the appellee, for the sum of two thousand dollars, the receipt of which was thereby acknowledged, the undivided nine-tenths part of two parcels of real estate, particularly described, containing in the aggregate…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fort Wayne, Jackson & Saginaw R. R. v. HusselmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Freeze v. DePuyIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Swales v. SouthardIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Walls v. Anderson, Lebanon & St. Louis R. R.Indiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Fisher v. State ex rel. WildermuthIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Bake v. SmileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MacyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Cox v. HunterIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Southwestern Cotton Seed Oil v. the Bank of StroudSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
  5. Davis v. MontgomeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API