Legal Opinion
Du Vaul v. Miller
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided June 19, 1953No. 7567PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REEVES, Chief Judge.
The defendants have filed their motion for judgment on the pleadings and have supported same by a tender of depositions, affidavits, and an extensive brief on the law.
The only question in the case is whether, upon the undisputed facts, the plaintiff, in any view of the case, is entitled to recover.
It is charged by plaintiff that on the 28th day of September, 1951, in Kansas City, Clay County, Missouri, “the defendants by and through their said agent (Wayne Hawkin) were operating a bulldozer with a cable attached, said cable being wrapped around a tree stump and hooked with…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Traylor v. Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
- Dulansky v. Iowa-Illinois Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
- McFarland v. Dixie MacHinery & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1941
- Fries v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Brown Shoe CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1959
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. Powers Foundation Drilling Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1968