Legal Opinion

Morrow v. Sweeney

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 19, 1894No. 1,157PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Howard Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

The appellee filed his complaint against the appellant to recover damages for an injury to a horse by coming in contact with a barbed wire fence placed by appellant around a lot owned by him in the city of Kokomo. Upon issue joined, there was a trial, verdict and judgment for appellee in the sum of forty-five dollars.

The complaint, omitting the caption, is as follows: “The plaintiff, Edward Sweeney, complains of the defendant, Jackson Morrow, and says that on or about the 25th day of November, 1892, the defendant, Jackson Morrow, was, and for two or three years prior to said date had been,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Faris v. HobergIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Brazil Block Coal Co. v. YoungIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Gagg v. VetterIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Thiele v. McManusIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Carskaddon v. MillsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MeansIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Edgington ex rel. Meyer v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  3. McLaughlin v. BardsenMontana Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Salem-Bedford Stone Co. v. O'BrienIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. Moore v. Ohio Oil Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API