Legal Opinion
Salem-Bedford Stone Co. v. O'Brien
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 19, 1895No. 1,574PublishedCited by 16 opinions
From the Lawrence Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Reinhard, J. —
Appellee sued the appellant and recovered damages in the sum of $3,000 for a personal injury received while in the employment of the appellant.
The complaint is in two paragraphs, to each of which a demurrer was overruled.
The jury answered certain interrogatories, and the appellant moved for a judgment upon these notwithstanding the general verdict, which motion was overruled, as was also the appellant’s motion for a new trial.
Without entering upon a discussion of the questions arising from the ruling of the court upon the demurrer and the motion for a judgment notwithstanding…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mayor of New-York v. BaileyNew York Supreme Court · 1845
- Thiele v. McManusIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
- Carskaddon v. MillsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
- Morrow v. SweeneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
- City of Madison v. RossIndiana Supreme Court · 1851
3Cited by16 opinions
- Perham v. Portland Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1898
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co. v. WadeTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
- Phillips v. CroyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- S. W. Little Coal Co. v. O'BrienIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
- Evansville, Mount Carmel & Northern Railway Co. v. ScottIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.