Carskaddon v. Mills
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the St. Joseph Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, C. J.
—
Action by the appellant against the appellees for damages for an injury to appellant’s horse. There was a trial by the court.
After the evidence for plaintiff was closed the court announced that there would be no necessity of hearing any evidence on the part of the defendants as that for the plaintiff was insufficient to entitle him to a recovery. The court thereupon found for the defendants. The only questions presented here arise upon the sufficiency of the evidence to *23sustain the finding. The facts disclosed by the evidence are as follows:
Anna Mills is the owner of a lot in the city of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mayhew v. BurnsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Penso v. McCormickIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Parish v. KaspareIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Houston & Texas Central Railway Co. v. BoozerTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Graves v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Upp v. DarnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Ewing v. RheaOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- Howe v. OhmartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
- McLaughlin v. BardsenMontana Supreme Court · 1915
- Salem-Bedford Stone Co. v. O'BrienIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.