Legal Opinion
Lonecke v. CitiGroup Pension Plan
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 19, 2009No. Docket 08-0459-cv (L), 08-0538-cv (XAP)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WESLEY, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs are five present or former employees of either Smith Barney or Citibank, N.A., both of which are divisions of Citigroup, Inc. (“Citigroup”). Plaintiffs, and the class they represent, allege that the Citibuilder Cash Balance Plan (“Plan”) violates the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Plaintiffs seek injunctive and declaratory relief as well as monetary damages.
By order dated December 11, 2006, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Scheindlin, J.) granted partial…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. JacobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Central Laborers' Pension Fund v. HeinzSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Frommert v. ConkrightCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Sally J. Burke v. Kodak Retirement Income Plan and Kodak Retirement Income Plan CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jamal Kifafi v. Hilton Hotel Retirement PlanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Laurent v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Laurent v. PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- United States v. Rigoberto AguirreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Carte v. American Electric Power Service CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.