Legal Opinion
Laurent v. PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 8, 2013No. 06 Civ. 2280(JPO)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge:
This case involves claims against Defendant PricewaterhouseCoopers (“PWC”) under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. (2000) (“ERISA”), relating to PWC’s Retirement Benefit Accumulation Plan for Employees of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“the RBAP”). Plaintiffs Timothy Laurent and Smeeta Sharon allege that the RBAP violates ERISA’s vesting and accrual standards by defining its “normal retirement age” as five years of service. They also allege that the summary plan description (“SPD”) is defective and that…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Arista Records, LLC v. Doe 3Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Laurent v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Laurent v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- City of New York v. GordonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Harrington v. Racki (In re Bishop)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · 2017
- Becerra-Paez v. Syracuse UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2025
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.