Legal Opinion

Spielman v. Albinson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 24, 1931No. 28,396PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Defendant corporation appealed from a judgment entered against it for $13,496.

The present important portion of a contract between plaintiff, the respondent herein, and appellant, arising out of a lengthy state of facts relating to a farm, is this:

“And thereafter [respondent] to give a quitclaim deed of said premises to said John A. Albinson Lumber Company [appellant] and take a mortgage back for whatever balance remains unpaid to him.”

At that time the balance had reference to an indebtedness due respondent evidenced by the personal note of John A. Albinson and secured by a second mortgage on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Klueter v. Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Cargill Commission Co. v. SwartwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  3. Osterberg v. Section 30 Development Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. Allen v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1863
  5. Pfeifer v. National Live Stock InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Steller v. ThomasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. Linquist v. Household Industrial Finance Co. (In Re Vondall)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2006
  3. Ries v. Ibach (In Re Ibach)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
  4. Day v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1940
  5. Day v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API