Legal Opinion
Cargill Commission Co. v. Swartwood
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 4, 1924No. 23,749PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Action on a written contract of guaranty. Verdict for defendants and appeal by plaintiff from the denial of its blended motion for judgment notwithstanding or a new trial.
The trial was had before Honorable Arthur B. Childress, former judge of the Fifth judicial district. The motion for judgment or a new trial did not come on for hearing until after his retirement *3from office, when it was submitted to and tbe order denying it made by Honorable W. L. Converse, one of tbe judges of tbe First judicial district.
Tbe Waseca Milling Company (for brevity hereinafter referred to as tbe milling…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Thompson v. LibbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Union Selling Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Wheaton Roller-Mill Co. v. John T. Noye Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Samuel H. Chute Co. v. LattaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Henry McShane Co. v. PadianNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Zell v. American Seating Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Bussard v. College of Saint Thomas, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Matthews v. Minnesota Tribune Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- South Florida Lumber Mills v. BreuchaudCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
- Anchor Casualty Co. v. Bird Island Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.