Legal Opinion
Dew v. United States
Army Court of Criminal Appeals
Decided April 23, 1998No. ARMY MISC. 9701700; ARMY 9500382PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT AND ACTION ON PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF IN THE NATURE OF A WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND A WRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS
CAIRNS, Judge:
In a Petition for Extraordinary Relief in the Nature of a Writ of Mandamus and a Writ of Error Coram Nobis, petitioner asks this court to: (1) issue a writ of mandamus ordering The Judge Advocate General to set aside the findings and sentence or, alternatively, ordering him to send petitioner’s court-martial to this court in accordance with Article 69(d), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 869(d)(1989) [hereinafter UCMJ], for further…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- In Re American Medical Systems, Inc. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Thomas v. United States Disciplinary BarracksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. ArnessCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
- United States v. ChapmanUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016
- Ponder v. StoneNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000
- Fisher v. Commander, Army Regional Confinement FacilityNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.